Apple is facing a lawsuit filed by consumers in California and Florida for allegedly violating unfair competition laws and the Michigan Consumer Protection Act. The lawsuit seeks more than $100 million in damages, and the law firm behind it is looking for US MacBook buyers to take a survey. If you’re interested in pursuing this lawsuit, here’s what you should know:
Apple’s response to “Flexgate” issues
As a consumer, you may be concerned about Apple’s handling of the Fluxgate issues on its MacBook Pro models. Apple’s decision to fix the issue on newer models was a significant improvement over the previous version, but this has not prevented customers from experiencing the same problems on older ones. The company has declined to comment on the situation, and iFixit and other repair communities have discussed the matter in depth.
The Fluxgate issue has now sparked a class-action lawsuit against Apple over the problems it caused MacBook Pro to display cables. A US District Judge has found that Apple should have known about this defect before the release of the 2016 and 2017 MacBook Pro models. The company has since fixed and refunded affected MacBook owners. The plaintiffs in the Fluxgate case, however, own 15-inch MacBook Pro laptops.
Apple’s response to “Batterygate” issues
A recent lawsuit filed by consumers in California and New York has brought the company to the negotiating table over battery-management practices. Apple was initially thought to be liable for the issues relating to batteries. But it’s now clear that chemical aging played a significant role in the failure of some batteries. Although Apple has apologized for the battery-related issues, it hasn’t offered any details regarding its remediation. Instead, the company has made some minor changes to its battery management practices and the way users can access these settings.
The company has now offered to lower the price of basic battery replacement for iPhone users, but it’s not clear whether it will work for other devices. But the company has offered an alternative for those affected by the battery performance problem: a new, improved iOS update. It’s unlikely that other phone manufacturers will follow suit, but they’ll have to do something. The company could even bring back some degree of repairability for existing devices, as the Samsung Galaxy S9 is unlikely to bring back a removable battery.
Apple’s response to MAC cosmetics class-action lawsuit
MAC Cosmetics Inc. has agreed to settle a proposed class-action lawsuit arising from its collection of ZIP code information during a purchase. The company will pay $365,000 to Class Members as compensation for violating their right to privacy. The company allegedly recorded ZIP codes of customers during a purchase to send marketing materials to their home addresses. Despite the settlement, MAC is still disputing the substance of the allegations made by Miller and the legal theory of her causes of action. The company, however, has agreed to the settlement after substantial negotiations.
The photographer who filed the lawsuit paid $2700 for a Retina display screen and received it nine months later. However, the display was plagued with dark smudges, interfering with her work, and her clients noticed it. The photographer eventually found out about the problem after conducting a Google search and contacted Apple’s customer support department. While the company denied that it was aware of the problem, the individual who was performing the fix had previously acknowledged the problem.
The settlement date for the MAC cosmetics class-action lawsuit
The date for the Settlement Date for the MAC cosmetics class action lawsuit has been set. In a coordinated proceeding, Judicial Council Proceeding Case No. 4471, plaintiffs have been offered a $12 Gift Card. However, this offer may not be enough for the class members. To resolve this issue, MAC has agreed to pay approximately $1.25 million. Settlement documents state that attorneys for the plaintiffs will receive up to 35 percent of the settlement.
The MAC cosmetics class-action lawsuit settled over allegations that it illegally obtained the names and zip codes of customers at the point of sale. The company denies any wrongdoing, but it settled to avoid expensive trial costs. The settlement includes a MAC gift card. MAC’s response to the proposed Settlement date was that it is not going to continue to send unsolicited advertisements. The MAC Cosmetics settlement is a win for customers who have been harmed by the company’s marketing practices.
