What is an independent contractor, and why does the Massachusetts Attorney General have filed a Complaint in Suffolk County seeking a Declaratory Judgment on behalf of Uber and Lyft? The lawsuit claims that Uber and Lyft improperly classified drivers as independent contractors and should provide workers with the protections that their rights require. In this article, I’ll discuss the main issues involved in an independent contractor lawsuit, as well as how to get the best results.

Class action lawsuit

A class-action lawsuit against Uber aims to make the ride-hailing app’s drivers a formalized employees. Drivers would then be entitled to job-related expenses such as vehicle insurance and maintenance, as well as minimum wage. The lawsuits are concerned with not only the relationship between Uber and its drivers but also the future of independent contractors in the “sharing economy.”

Ultimately, the court found that the Uber drivers were employees, even though some of them own their independent transportation businesses. However, the Court found that the Plaintiffs met the “workable plan” requirement of class representation and did not face any conflict of interest with other members of the class. Although the Court found that the class representative’s claims are typical of the class, it is unclear if the individual plaintiffs would have much chance of succeeding in a trial.

The ruling was not binding for the drivers, but it does provide an important precedent for class actions. In California, the law does not distinguish between employees and independent contractors, and most determinations are made by sifting through similar judicial decisions. Uber has a large number of drivers who can join the lawsuit. As such, the class size is very large – more than 50,000 people – and could be impacted.

Legal classification

While the former Uber driver claims that he is an employee, the company says that drivers are independent contractors. As an independent contractor, he receives no benefits such as health insurance, paid vacation, and other benefits that are not available to employees. Uber wants to maintain the legal classification of drivers as independent contractors, arguing that they prefer this business model. It is better for Uber from a cost perspective.

The gig economy began long before the coronavirus pandemic ravaged the country. Many companies are considering reclassifying drivers as employees to avoid major financial and legal liability and to provide common employee benefits. This decision would challenge the current business model of independent contractors and set a precedent for similar businesses in the sharing economy. Regardless, Uber is determined to fight the lawsuit and will continue to classify its drivers as independent contractors.


An Uber lawsuit has raised the question of whether the company should classify drivers as independent contractors or employees. While it’s not clear how Uber should classify drivers, it has been known that they must accept any ride requests from customers and transport them at all times. Uber should consider reclassifying their drivers into employee status. If Uber doesn’t, the driver could be entitled to a pay scale that is equal to that of an employee.

Although it is not entirely clear whether an Uber driver is an employee or an independent contractor, the company’s drivers are considered independent contractors by U.S. law. In other words, independent contractors give up nearly all rights under the law. In this case, Uber and Lyft argue that converting their drivers into employees would jeopardize their operations. Uber, for one, is challenging California’s proposed law that would force companies to treat drivers like full-time employees.

Protections for workers

Recent rulings in California have made Uber and Lyft employees, rather than independent contractors, employees. That means they have the right to benefits and job-related expenses, such as car insurance and maintenance. The lawsuits are also a threat to the future of the independent contractor relationship in the “sharing economy.”

These lawsuits are based on Uber’s misclassifications of workers as independent contractors and denial of basic protections under Massachusetts Wage and Hour Laws. Drivers are not paid for the time between rides and are not reimbursed for necessary business expenses. In addition, their policies do not comply with the Massachusetts Earned Sick Time Act. Moreover, Uber drivers are not allowed to challenge their wrongful termination in court, instead, they must seek arbitration.

The lawsuit argues that Uber drivers should be treated as employees. While Uber considers drivers independent contractors, the California government claims that the company should treat its drivers as employees. By treating drivers like workers, a company would be held more accountable. Drivers would enjoy the flexibility of being independent contractors, while Uber would be forced to raise its prices. For both sides, the lawsuit has the potential to lead to a settlement agreement. So far, it remains unclear whether Uber will comply with the proposed ruling.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *