The Pressler Case – Is It A Real Estate Asset That Can Be Owned?
In the late 1920’s a group of ranchers in Wyoming chose to settle out of court with a rancher named Harry Pressler and his wife, Edith. In this case, the Presslers were trying to get the courts to award them the ownership rights to their cattle ranch after they had sued the ranchers and the United States government for an ownership right.
The case was a very complicated one, even by the standards of the time. It ended up going all the way up to the Supreme Court. At the end of it, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the ranchers. In particular, they ruled that the U.S. government could not legally interfere with a private contract between a private party and their fellow citizens.
Harry Pressler had been born into a poor family in Nebraska. He later moved to Texas where he became an insurance man. His cattle ranching career took him to Wyoming where he eventually decided to purchase the ranch from Harry and Edith Pressler. This would make them the owners of the largest cattle ranch in Wyoming at the time. Their daughter later married John Sayers and they became the richest couple in the state of Wyoming.
Harry Pressler, who were the owner of the ranch, and Edith Pressler, who were the main beneficiary of the estate, became friends and eventually started a business together. This would eventually become the ranching industry in Wyoming. Harry continued to own his own cattle ranch in Wyoming for decades.
When the Presslers’ daughter, Elizabeth, died in 1980, it was then that the ranchers sued the government and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Their lawsuit was intended to claim the rightful ownership of their cattle because they believed they should own their cattle because they had been with their partners in the ranching business. They claimed that the government had denied them the right to own the ranch because of an obscure clause in the cattle contract.
In fact, Harry Pressler and Edith Pressler were very friendly with the secretary of the Department of the Interior at the time. It was not until she asked Harry how he would feel if he owned the ranch, which the rancher said he didn’t want to own, that the secretary of the Interior said that she would be happy to buy it. and use it as a national park for the rancher’s grandchildren.
Harry Pressler and Edith Pressler sued the government and won the case and they got the ranch back. Unfortunately, the ranchers later learned that the U.S. government didn’t actually have the legal power to buy back a rancher’s property. The case was a huge waste of time and money.
There are no clear cut winners or losers when it comes to the Pressler lawsuit. The ranchers were able to get the property back but in the end, the government was able to prevent the ranchers from receiving any compensation for the loss of the ranch.
Another aspect of the Pressler lawsuit is that it is highly controversial and there are many critics who don’t believe that it is legitimate. Some of the critics who were very outspoken about the case said that they feel that it was just another way to benefit the ranchers. Many of these critics say that the ranchers were trying to make some money by using the government as a way to avoid the legal costs. of paying the cattle contractors.
Many people believe that the ranchers should not be allowed to own the cattle ranch, but the Pressler lawsuit is still going on today. This case is still active, and has been on appeal for a number of years.
If the case were to be won, the case involves cattle contract with the United States. Department of the Interior, the rancher should be paid, but at this point in time, the rancher is not yet sure whether they will win the case.
It should be noted that the Pressler lawsuit is not the only ranching lawsuit currently going on. There are a number of similar lawsuits going on all over the country where ranchers are fighting to get their cows and other livestock back. People are often in agreement that ranchers should be allowed to own their cattle. However, ranchers who have been in the same situation are fighting for the rights to keep their cattle and other livestock in the land that they have been raised on.
